<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the math hurts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/</link>
	<description>thoughtful personal finance, career and health advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-29784</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-29784</guid>
		<description>If you are buying more shares now, perhaps the dollar cost averaging helps a bit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lately, I&#039;ve been wondering if the 8-10% expectations we&#039;ve had is sustainable long term.  If you think about it, stock prices are related to earnings.  How can earnings of companies grow 10% each year if wages aren&#039;t growing (i.e. you need people to make more to be able to buy more products or pay higher prices).  I don&#039;t think wages haven&#039;t been growing at 10%, but historically we&#039;ve added another income (largely women entering the workforce and making larger salaries) and living on more credit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If those two things were what lead to the big historical gains that may be a problem in the future.  We aren&#039;t adding more incomes to our families and living on credit doesn&#039;t seem to be the option any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are buying more shares now, perhaps the dollar cost averaging helps a bit.</p>
<p>Lately, I&#39;ve been wondering if the 8-10% expectations we&#39;ve had is sustainable long term.  If you think about it, stock prices are related to earnings.  How can earnings of companies grow 10% each year if wages aren&#39;t growing (i.e. you need people to make more to be able to buy more products or pay higher prices).  I don&#39;t think wages haven&#39;t been growing at 10%, but historically we&#39;ve added another income (largely women entering the workforce and making larger salaries) and living on more credit.</p>
<p>If those two things were what lead to the big historical gains that may be a problem in the future.  We aren&#39;t adding more incomes to our families and living on credit doesn&#39;t seem to be the option any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Roundup - Daylight Savings Edition &#124; Cash Money Life &#124; Cash Money Life</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26226</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Roundup - Daylight Savings Edition &#124; Cash Money Life &#124; Cash Money Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26226</guid>
		<description>[...] the math hurts. The recent market losses have eroded a lot of wealth from retirement accounts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the math hurts. The recent market losses have eroded a lot of wealth from retirement accounts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26227</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26227</guid>
		<description>If you are buying more shares now, perhaps the dollar cost averaging helps a bit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lately, I&#039;ve been wondering if the 8-10% expectations we&#039;ve had is sustainable long term.  If you think about it, stock prices are related to earnings.  How can earnings of companies grow 10% each year if wages aren&#039;t growing (i.e. you need people to make more to be able to buy more products or pay higher prices).  I don&#039;t think wages haven&#039;t been growing at 10%, but historically we&#039;ve added another income (largely women entering the workforce and making larger salaries) and living on more credit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If those two things were what lead to the big historical gains that may be a problem in the future.  We aren&#039;t adding more incomes to our families and living on credit doesn&#039;t seem to be the option any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are buying more shares now, perhaps the dollar cost averaging helps a bit.</p>
<p>Lately, I&#39;ve been wondering if the 8-10% expectations we&#39;ve had is sustainable long term.  If you think about it, stock prices are related to earnings.  How can earnings of companies grow 10% each year if wages aren&#39;t growing (i.e. you need people to make more to be able to buy more products or pay higher prices).  I don&#39;t think wages haven&#39;t been growing at 10%, but historically we&#39;ve added another income (largely women entering the workforce and making larger salaries) and living on more credit.</p>
<p>If those two things were what lead to the big historical gains that may be a problem in the future.  We aren&#39;t adding more incomes to our families and living on credit doesn&#39;t seem to be the option any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supplement Reviewer</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26211</link>
		<dc:creator>Supplement Reviewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 11:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26211</guid>
		<description>I need to read stuff like this - my latest consulting contract is ending soon and with the financial services industry crumbling in NYC I may be problogging again real soon…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to read stuff like this &#8211; my latest consulting contract is ending soon and with the financial services industry crumbling in NYC I may be problogging again real soon…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabloid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26199</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabloid.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26199</guid>
		<description>@ Richard:  Bonds in many cases don&#039;t perform well after taking the rate of inflation into account, let alone the REAL rate of inflation.  Corporate bonds are far from 100% safe in most cases, as has been found out recently.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I prefer to invest in individual companies because I&#039;d rather invest my money into great companies I understand (in my circle of competence) than invest in ALL companies, many of which are poorly managed or capitalized.  I don&#039;t want &#039;average&#039; market returns either... I invest in businesses, not the entire economy and will settle for the returns I get, which I think will be better than the overall economy... if not, so be it.  At least I&#039;m comfortable with my investments and with any drops or rises in their valuations.  I know when the price goes down below a certain point, my company is undervalued, and when it goes above a certain point, its overvalued... So when the value goes down, many on Wall Street freak out, but I might be sitting there buying more shares in a PARTICULAR company that I know is being thrown out with the bath water... even if the economy has a grim outlook for a few years... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The real problem is the REAL rate of inflation in regards to your returns.  Then taxes come into account afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Richard:  Bonds in many cases don&#39;t perform well after taking the rate of inflation into account, let alone the REAL rate of inflation.  Corporate bonds are far from 100% safe in most cases, as has been found out recently.</p>
<p>I prefer to invest in individual companies because I&#39;d rather invest my money into great companies I understand (in my circle of competence) than invest in ALL companies, many of which are poorly managed or capitalized.  I don&#39;t want &#39;average&#39; market returns either&#8230; I invest in businesses, not the entire economy and will settle for the returns I get, which I think will be better than the overall economy&#8230; if not, so be it.  At least I&#39;m comfortable with my investments and with any drops or rises in their valuations.  I know when the price goes down below a certain point, my company is undervalued, and when it goes above a certain point, its overvalued&#8230; So when the value goes down, many on Wall Street freak out, but I might be sitting there buying more shares in a PARTICULAR company that I know is being thrown out with the bath water&#8230; even if the economy has a grim outlook for a few years&#8230; </p>
<p>The real problem is the REAL rate of inflation in regards to your returns.  Then taxes come into account afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepali</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26156</link>
		<dc:creator>deepali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26156</guid>
		<description>i am thinking that the point of &quot;long-term&quot; is also that it&#039;s not about putting in money at time X and not touching it for 30 years, but to continuously invest over 30 years.  So the funds that you bought before and are down now will take a while to recover. But if you bought the same funds now, they&#039;ll see some exponential gains in the next 30 years.  I guess over time, it all evens out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am thinking that the point of &#8220;long-term&#8221; is also that it&#39;s not about putting in money at time X and not touching it for 30 years, but to continuously invest over 30 years.  So the funds that you bought before and are down now will take a while to recover. But if you bought the same funds now, they&#39;ll see some exponential gains in the next 30 years.  I guess over time, it all evens out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plonkee</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26155</link>
		<dc:creator>plonkee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26155</guid>
		<description>I feel confident that there will be one or two more bubbles and crashes before my retirement at the very least. I&#039;m just not planning on overexposing myself to any of them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If this crisis is anything like the depression it&#039;ll take about 18-20 years for your stocks to recover. On the bright side things that you buy during that time will be cheap and rise in value. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course it could all end up like Japan and just stay flat for years and years. Not every stock market in the world averages a positive return over the medium to long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel confident that there will be one or two more bubbles and crashes before my retirement at the very least. I&#39;m just not planning on overexposing myself to any of them.</p>
<p>If this crisis is anything like the depression it&#39;ll take about 18-20 years for your stocks to recover. On the bright side things that you buy during that time will be cheap and rise in value. </p>
<p>Of course it could all end up like Japan and just stay flat for years and years. Not every stock market in the world averages a positive return over the medium to long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26152</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26152</guid>
		<description>Hmmm that is a sobering thought though... 11 years just to make it back to 2007? Wow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have the unfortunate luck of being whalloped by equities AND international because of the dollar strengthening (or should I say, other currencies weakening faster than we are)... yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm that is a sobering thought though&#8230; 11 years just to make it back to 2007? Wow.</p>
<p>You have the unfortunate luck of being whalloped by equities AND international because of the dollar strengthening (or should I say, other currencies weakening faster than we are)&#8230; yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26151</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26151</guid>
		<description>do you really think we&#039;ll ever get 10 percent?&lt;br&gt;6 is more reasonable. factor in taxes. we&#039;re&lt;br&gt;all screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you really think we&#39;ll ever get 10 percent?<br />6 is more reasonable. factor in taxes. we&#39;re<br />all screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funny about Money</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26147</link>
		<dc:creator>Funny about Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26147</guid>
		<description>Thank you. You just put in a nutshell what I&#039;ve been trying to explain to my friends who can NOT understand why I&#039;m in a blue funk. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In 11 years I will be almost 75 years old. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had planned to retire in a year or two. Now -- assuming the rumors of layoffs at my employer&#039;s shop don&#039;t come to fruition -- I likely will not retire. Ever. This situation has already left me totally screwed, and it&#039;s far from over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. You just put in a nutshell what I&#39;ve been trying to explain to my friends who can NOT understand why I&#39;m in a blue funk. </p>
<p>In 11 years I will be almost 75 years old. </p>
<p>I had planned to retire in a year or two. Now &#8212; assuming the rumors of layoffs at my employer&#39;s shop don&#39;t come to fruition &#8212; I likely will not retire. Ever. This situation has already left me totally screwed, and it&#39;s far from over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bripblap</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26146</link>
		<dc:creator>bripblap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26146</guid>
		<description>WC, I&#039;m plowing more into it, trust me - I upped the contribution percentage and I&#039;m hoping that future contributions beat my losses.  I had two funds that slaughtered my returns, and one in particular (a mid-cap fund) has gone to almost worthless.  My 401(k) doesn&#039;t offer a good mix of index funds, mostly managed junk, so I take the blame for not going super-conservative with the 401(k) and putting the risk in my IRAs and brokerage where I have more control and choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not TOO worried - I&#039;m young, I have time to recover.  I hope...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WC, I&#39;m plowing more into it, trust me &#8211; I upped the contribution percentage and I&#39;m hoping that future contributions beat my losses.  I had two funds that slaughtered my returns, and one in particular (a mid-cap fund) has gone to almost worthless.  My 401(k) doesn&#39;t offer a good mix of index funds, mostly managed junk, so I take the blame for not going super-conservative with the 401(k) and putting the risk in my IRAs and brokerage where I have more control and choice.</p>
<p>I&#39;m not TOO worried &#8211; I&#39;m young, I have time to recover.  I hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bripblap</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26145</link>
		<dc:creator>bripblap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26145</guid>
		<description>Richard, you&#039;re closer to the point than I was.  My mistake was buying into the market when it was overpriced - not my asset allocation, or the amount or anything like that.  If you buy an $800 asset for $1000, you&#039;re going to lose eventually. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s the biggest weakness of 401(k)s, in my opinion - limited choices and an emphasis on buying on schedule rather than when ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, you&#39;re closer to the point than I was.  My mistake was buying into the market when it was overpriced &#8211; not my asset allocation, or the amount or anything like that.  If you buy an $800 asset for $1000, you&#39;re going to lose eventually. </p>
<p>It&#39;s the biggest weakness of 401(k)s, in my opinion &#8211; limited choices and an emphasis on buying on schedule rather than when ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bripblap</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26144</link>
		<dc:creator>bripblap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26144</guid>
		<description>Mr. TML, absolutely - my asset allocation in my 401(k) is harshly, HARSHLY limited by the choices available.  My asset allocation is not in funds I would choose in an open market.  Of course that begs the question of why I&#039;m investing in my 401(k) at all, and I&#039;ll beg the usual excuses:  matching, tax advantages, etc.  All wiped out by the loss, of course...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. TML, absolutely &#8211; my asset allocation in my 401(k) is harshly, HARSHLY limited by the choices available.  My asset allocation is not in funds I would choose in an open market.  Of course that begs the question of why I&#39;m investing in my 401(k) at all, and I&#39;ll beg the usual excuses:  matching, tax advantages, etc.  All wiped out by the loss, of course&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bripblap</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26143</link>
		<dc:creator>bripblap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26143</guid>
		<description>Joe, it might be a bit misleading - I just mean that even at 13% it takes a long time to rebuild a loss that significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, it might be a bit misleading &#8211; I just mean that even at 13% it takes a long time to rebuild a loss that significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer&#39;s Coin</title>
		<link>http://www.bripblap.com/the-math-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-26141</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer&#39;s Coin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bripblap.com/?p=599#comment-26141</guid>
		<description>My portfolio sounds similar to yours: index funds of the same exact kind almost. I&#039;m also curious how you are down 65%. Did one particular fund slow you down more than the others? It sounds like we have similar allocations but I&#039;m not down nearly that much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way, I wouldn&#039;t be worried. Let&#039;s just keep plowing more and more into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My portfolio sounds similar to yours: index funds of the same exact kind almost. I&#39;m also curious how you are down 65%. Did one particular fund slow you down more than the others? It sounds like we have similar allocations but I&#39;m not down nearly that much.</p>
<p>Either way, I wouldn&#39;t be worried. Let&#39;s just keep plowing more and more into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

